Non-urgent unplanned visits are frequently observed in pregnancy. However, there are no studies from Nigeria exploring its burden. A cross-sectional cohort survey of 1,182 women at the only state-owned teaching hospital in Ado - Ekiti was conducted to address this need. One-quarter of the population studied had unplanned antenatal visits during the period of care. Only about one in four of the reasons for the unplanned visits were ‘direct’ pregnancy-related complaints, while the largest proportion of the women, 227 (73.5%), visited on account of infectious morbidities, followed by gastrointestinal disorders, 63 (20.4%). Mothers who were skilled workers were significantly more likely to have unplanned antenatal visits compared with their unemployed counterparts (45.3% versus 20.7%, p = 0.013). Unplanned visits were significantly more in women who had reduced fetal movements (9.4% versus 0.9%, p < 0.0001); significantly more women who had out-of-schedule prenatal visits were admitted for care (37.9% versus 0.2%, p < 0.0001), and had induction of labour (20.1% versus 10.3%, p < 0.0001) when compared with those who had no unplanned visits. Reduced maternal perception of fetal movements (odds ratio: 7.57; 95% C. I. 3.07 - 18.70, p < 0.0001), prenatal admission (odds ratio: 241.81; 95% C. I. 59.02 - 990.75, p < 0.0001), and induction of labour (odds ratio: 1.90; 95% C. I. 1.24 - 2.93, p = 0.003) were found to be independently associated with unplanned antenatal visits.
Published in | American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15 |
Page(s) | 68-72 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Unplanned Visits, Non-urgent, Emergency Department, Prenatal Care, Referral System, Nigeria
[1] | Northington W, Brice J, Zou B. Use of an emergency department by non-urgent patients. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2005; 23: 131-137. |
[2] | Guttman N, Zimmerman D, Nelson M. The Many Faces of Access: Reasons for Medically Non-urgent Emergency Department Visits. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2003; 28 (6): 1089-120. |
[3] | Kellerman A. Nonurgent emergency department visits. JAMA 1994; 271: 1953-1955. |
[4] | Redstone P, Vancura J, Barry D, Kutner J. Nonurgent Use of the Emergency Department. J Ambulatory Care Manage 2008; 31 (4): 370-376. |
[5] | Phelps K, Taylor C, Kimmel S, Nagel R, Klein W, Puczynski S. Factors associated with emergency department utilization for nonurgent pediatric problems. Arch Fam Med 2000; 9: 1086-1092. |
[6] | Carret M, Fassa A, Kawachi I. Demand for emergency health service: factors associated with inappropriate use. BMC Health Services Research 2007; 7: 131. |
[7] | Cunningham P, Clancy C, Cohen J, Wilets M. The use of hospital emergency departments for nonurgent health problems. Medical Case Research and Review 1995; 52 (4): 453-474. |
[8] | Weinick R, Burns R, Mehrotra A. Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics. Health Affairs 2010; 29 (9): 1630-1636. |
[9] | Uscher-Pines L, Pines J, Kellermann A, Gillen E, Mehrotra A. Deciding to visit the emergency department for non-urgent conditions: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Manag Care 2013; 19 (1): 47-59. |
[10] | Akande TM. Referral system in Nigeria: study of a tertiary health facility. Annals of African Medicine 2004; 3 (3): 130-3. |
[11] | Kadooka Y, Asai A, Enzo A, Okita T. Misuse of emergent healthcare in contemporary Japan. BMC Emerg Med 2017; 17: 23. |
[12] | Trezeciak S, Rivers EP. Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat of patient safety and public health. Emerg Med J 2003; 20: 402-5. |
[13] | Bayley MD, Schwartz JS, Shofer FS, Weiner M, Sites FD, Traber KB, Hollander JE. The financial burden of emergency department congestion and hospital crowding for chest pain patients awaiting admission. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45: 110-7. |
[14] | Derlet RW, Richards JR. Overcrowding in the nation's emergency departments; complex causes and disturbing effect. Ann Emerg Med 2000; 35: 63-8. |
[15] | Pauly MV, Zweifel P, Scheffler RM, Preker AS, Bassett M. Private health insurance in developing countries. Health Affairs 2006; 25 (2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.25.2.369. |
[16] | Dunne MO, Martin AJ. The appropriateness of A and E attendances: a prospective study. Ireland Med J 1997; 90: 268-9. |
[17] | Kotelchuck M. The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Its U.S. distribution and association with low birthweight. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 1486-9. |
[18] | Kogan MD, Martin JA, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Ventura SJ, Frigoletto FD. The changing pattern of prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981−1995, using different prenatal care indices. JAMA 1998; 279: 1623-8. |
[19] | Kilfoyle KA, Vrees R, Raker CA, Matteson KA. Non-urgent and urgent emergency department use during pregnancy: an observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 26 (2): 181.e1-181.e7. |
[20] | Bossyns P, van Lerberghe W. The weakest link: competence and prestige as constraints to referral by isolated nurses in rural Niger. BMC Human Resources for Health 2004; 2: 1-8. |
[21] | Laffoy M, O'Herlihy B, Keye G. A profile of attendees to a south Dublin city accident and emergency department. Ireland J Med Sci 1997; 166: 35-7. |
[22] | Magriples U, Kershaw TS, Rising SS, Massey Z, Ickovics JR. Prenatal health care beyond the obstetrics service: Utilization and predictors of unscheduled care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198 (1): 75.e1-75.e7. |
[23] | World Bank: Development in practice. Better health in Africa: experience and lessons learned. Word Bank Publication, 1994; 45-51. |
[24] | Young GP, Wagner MB, Kellermann AL, Ellis J, Bouley D. Ambulatory visits to hospital emergency departments. Patterns and reasons for use. 24 Hours in the ED Study Group. JAMA 1996; 276 (6): 460-465. |
APA Style
Awoleke Jacob Olumuyiwa, Olofinbiyi Babatunde Ajayi, Awoleke Adeola Olabisi, Olofinbiyi Rebecca Oluwafunke. (2019). Burden of Unplanned Antenatal Visits in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: Making a Case for an Improved Referral System. American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences, 7(3), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15
ACS Style
Awoleke Jacob Olumuyiwa; Olofinbiyi Babatunde Ajayi; Awoleke Adeola Olabisi; Olofinbiyi Rebecca Oluwafunke. Burden of Unplanned Antenatal Visits in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: Making a Case for an Improved Referral System. Am. J. Biomed. Life Sci. 2019, 7(3), 68-72. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15
AMA Style
Awoleke Jacob Olumuyiwa, Olofinbiyi Babatunde Ajayi, Awoleke Adeola Olabisi, Olofinbiyi Rebecca Oluwafunke. Burden of Unplanned Antenatal Visits in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: Making a Case for an Improved Referral System. Am J Biomed Life Sci. 2019;7(3):68-72. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15, author = {Awoleke Jacob Olumuyiwa and Olofinbiyi Babatunde Ajayi and Awoleke Adeola Olabisi and Olofinbiyi Rebecca Oluwafunke}, title = {Burden of Unplanned Antenatal Visits in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: Making a Case for an Improved Referral System}, journal = {American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences}, volume = {7}, number = {3}, pages = {68-72}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbls.20190703.15}, abstract = {Non-urgent unplanned visits are frequently observed in pregnancy. However, there are no studies from Nigeria exploring its burden. A cross-sectional cohort survey of 1,182 women at the only state-owned teaching hospital in Ado - Ekiti was conducted to address this need. One-quarter of the population studied had unplanned antenatal visits during the period of care. Only about one in four of the reasons for the unplanned visits were ‘direct’ pregnancy-related complaints, while the largest proportion of the women, 227 (73.5%), visited on account of infectious morbidities, followed by gastrointestinal disorders, 63 (20.4%). Mothers who were skilled workers were significantly more likely to have unplanned antenatal visits compared with their unemployed counterparts (45.3% versus 20.7%, p = 0.013). Unplanned visits were significantly more in women who had reduced fetal movements (9.4% versus 0.9%, p < 0.0001); significantly more women who had out-of-schedule prenatal visits were admitted for care (37.9% versus 0.2%, p < 0.0001), and had induction of labour (20.1% versus 10.3%, p < 0.0001) when compared with those who had no unplanned visits. Reduced maternal perception of fetal movements (odds ratio: 7.57; 95% C. I. 3.07 - 18.70, p < 0.0001), prenatal admission (odds ratio: 241.81; 95% C. I. 59.02 - 990.75, p < 0.0001), and induction of labour (odds ratio: 1.90; 95% C. I. 1.24 - 2.93, p = 0.003) were found to be independently associated with unplanned antenatal visits.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Burden of Unplanned Antenatal Visits in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria: Making a Case for an Improved Referral System AU - Awoleke Jacob Olumuyiwa AU - Olofinbiyi Babatunde Ajayi AU - Awoleke Adeola Olabisi AU - Olofinbiyi Rebecca Oluwafunke Y1 - 2019/07/13 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15 T2 - American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences JF - American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences JO - American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences SP - 68 EP - 72 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-880X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20190703.15 AB - Non-urgent unplanned visits are frequently observed in pregnancy. However, there are no studies from Nigeria exploring its burden. A cross-sectional cohort survey of 1,182 women at the only state-owned teaching hospital in Ado - Ekiti was conducted to address this need. One-quarter of the population studied had unplanned antenatal visits during the period of care. Only about one in four of the reasons for the unplanned visits were ‘direct’ pregnancy-related complaints, while the largest proportion of the women, 227 (73.5%), visited on account of infectious morbidities, followed by gastrointestinal disorders, 63 (20.4%). Mothers who were skilled workers were significantly more likely to have unplanned antenatal visits compared with their unemployed counterparts (45.3% versus 20.7%, p = 0.013). Unplanned visits were significantly more in women who had reduced fetal movements (9.4% versus 0.9%, p < 0.0001); significantly more women who had out-of-schedule prenatal visits were admitted for care (37.9% versus 0.2%, p < 0.0001), and had induction of labour (20.1% versus 10.3%, p < 0.0001) when compared with those who had no unplanned visits. Reduced maternal perception of fetal movements (odds ratio: 7.57; 95% C. I. 3.07 - 18.70, p < 0.0001), prenatal admission (odds ratio: 241.81; 95% C. I. 59.02 - 990.75, p < 0.0001), and induction of labour (odds ratio: 1.90; 95% C. I. 1.24 - 2.93, p = 0.003) were found to be independently associated with unplanned antenatal visits. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -