Transport and international agencies invest millions of dollars on road projects to support countries develop their infrastructure; therefore, it is important to ensure longer service life and value for money. The primary function of the pavement structure is to keep distresses, including fatigue cracking and permanent deformation, to an acceptable limit so that the pavement can withstand applied vehicle load and repetitions during the service duration. Furthermore, the layered structure of the pavement is intended to ensure that the vehicle contact pressure is distributed in such a way that critical responses at the bottom layer of the pavement are low enough to avoid severe damage. Two typical procedures associated with roadway pavement design are empirical-based and structural analysis methods. However, the empirical-based methods have significant shortcomings, as predicting the mode and extent of pavement performance becomes a major challenge. Alternatively, the structural analysis methods have advanced extensively with computers since they consider crucial factors such as traffic loads, material characteristics and environmental conditions. The imputation of these parameters into the computer algorithm contributes to a better understanding of the mechanical performance of constituent pavement material responses. The predicted responses enable highway engineers to select appropriate pavement compositions that will deteriorate at a satisfactory level during the time of service. The most common structural analysis approaches are analytical modelling and numerical simulation. On the other hand, differences in analysis results generation using these approaches have been a notable concern. This review article presents a synopsis of typical pavement design methods and the problem connected with them; structural approaches to identify factors influencing their accuracy. Furthermore, computer algorithms use due to their usefulness, and the assumptions of layered theories employed in pavement structural design are discussed to uncover potential drawbacks for future upgrades.
Published in | International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology (Volume 8, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12 |
Page(s) | 13-23 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Highway Pavements, Design Methods, Structural Approaches, Computer Algorithms, Pavement Distresses
[1] | Havens, J. H., Deen, R. C. and Southgate, H. F., 1973. Pavement Design. Special Report-Highway Research Board. (140): 130. |
[2] | Scala, A., 1956. Simple methods of flexible pavement design using cone penetrometers. New Zealand Engineering. 11 (2): 34-44. |
[3] | Southgate, H. F., Deen, R. C., Havens, J. H. and Drake, W. B., 1976. Kentucky research: A flexible pavement design and management system. Transportation Research Report. |
[4] | Banan, M. and Hjelmstad, K., 1996. Neural networks and AASHO road test. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 122 (5): 358-366. |
[5] | Liddle, W., 1962. Application of AASHO road test results to the design of flexible pavement structures. International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements. SupplementUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor. |
[6] | Hall, K. D. and Beam, S., 2005. Estimating the sensitivity of design input variables for rigid pavement analysis with a mechanistic-empirical design guide. Transportation Research Record. 1919 (1): 65-73. |
[7] | Ghavidel, A., Mousavi, S. R. and Rashki, M., 2018. The effect of FEM mesh density on the failure probability analysis of structures. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 22 (7): 2370-2383. |
[8] | Hanyan, Gu, X. J., Zhenkun L., Kang Y., and Yanjun Q., 2019. Comparisons of Two Typical Specialized Finite Element Programs for Mechanical Analysis of Cement Concrete Pavement. Hindawi Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2019: 11. |
[9] | Jamshidi, A., 2021. Analysis of Pavement Structures. Sustainability. 13 (11): 6098. |
[10] | Nasir, D. S., Pantua, C. A. J., Zhou, B., Vital, B., Calautit, J. and Hughes, B., 2021. Numerical analysis of an urban road pavement solar collector (U-RPSC) for heat island mitigation: Impact on the urban environment. Renewable Energy. 164: 618-641. |
[11] | Fwa, T. F., 2005. The handbook of highway engineering. |
[12] | Bulusu, V. J., Kusam, S. R. and Muppireddy, A. R., 2020. A critical review of the PCA and IRC methods of thin white topping pavement design. Transportation Research Procedia. 48: 3764-3769. |
[13] | Congress, I. R., 2001. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. |
[14] | Officials, T., 2008. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: a manual of practice. |
[15] | Mohammed, M., Shallal, E., Elsir, S. and Ahmed, J. N. T., 2019 Comparison between the Empirical and Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Methods. |
[16] | Officials, T., 1993. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. |
[17] | Maharaj, R., Ramjattan-Harry, V. and Mohamed, N., 2015. Rutting and fatigue cracking resistance of waste cooking oil modified trinidad asphaltic materials. The Scientific World Journal. |
[18] | Korayem, A. H., Ziari, H., Hajiloo, M. and Moniri, A., 2018. Rutting and fatigue performance of asphalt mixtures containing amorphous carbon as filler and binder modifier. Construction and Building Materials. 188: 905-914. |
[19] | Werkmeister, S., Falla, G. C., and Oeser, M., 2015. Analytical Design Methodology for Thin Surfaced Asphalt Pavements in Germany. Airfield and Highway Pavements. |
[20] | Papagiannakis, E. A. M., 2007. Pavement Design and Materials. United States of America. |
[21] | Yinka, O. O. and Adeyemi, O. F., 2012. Application of Bousinesq's and Westergaard's formulae in analyzing foundation stress distribution for a failed telecommunication mast. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research. 5 (4): 71-77. |
[22] | Ferreira, A. and Abambres, M., 2020. Application of ANN in Pavement Engineering: State-of-Art. TechRxiv. |
[23] | Dong, Z. and Ma, X., 2017. Analytical solutions of asphalt pavement responses under moving loads with arbitrary non-uniform tire contact pressure and irregular tire imprint. Road Materials and Pavement Design. 19 (8): 1887-1903. |
[24] | Huang, Y. H., 2004. Paavement Analysis and Design. United States of America. |
[25] | Huang, B., Li, G. and Shua, X., 2006. Investigation into three-layered HMA mixtures. Composites Part B: Engineering. 37 (7-8): 679-690. |
[26] | Huang, Y. H., 2004. Pavement Analysis and Design. United State of America. |
[27] | Huang, H., Luo, J., Moaveni, M., Qamhia, I., Tutumluer, E., and Tingle, J., 2019. Advanced Analytical Tool for Flexible Pavement Design and Evaluation. Airfield and Highway Pavements. |
[28] | Mallick, R. B. and El-Korchi, T., 2018. Pavement Engineering. Broken Sound Parkway NW. |
[29] | Mukabi, J., 2018. Advancing the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Method through Application of Thickness-Modulus Ratio Concepts. Proceedings of the 3rd World (CSEE'18), Budapest, Hungary. |
[30] | Maqbali, L. A. and Ragab, O., 2021. A Review of Software in Flexible Pavement Design. Sustainability in Environment. 6 (2): 71-77. |
[31] | Chandak, P. G., Tapase, A. B., Sayyed, S. S. and Attar, A. C., 2018. A State-of-the-Art Review of Different Conditions Influencing the Behavioral Aspects of Flexible Pavement. Advancement in the Design and Performance of Sustainable Asphalt Pavements, Cham, Springer International Publishing. |
[32] | Beskou, N. D. and Theodorakopoulos, D. D., 2011. Dynamic effects of moving loads on road pavements: A review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 31 (4): 547-567. |
[33] | Wayessa, S. G., Quezon, Emer T., and Kumela, Tarekegn (2017). Analysis of Stress- Strain and Deflection of Flexible Pavements Using Finite Element Method Case Study on Bako-Nekemte Road. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering. 2: 100-111. |
[34] | Heymsfield, E. and Tingle, J. S., 2019. State of the practice in pavement structural design/analysis codes relevant to airfield pavement design. Engineering Failure Analysis. 105: 12-24. |
[35] | Deyu, C. and Xu, Y., 2013. Finite Element Analysis in Engineering. Beijing, China. |
[36] | Nguyen, V. D., Béchet, E., Geuzaine, C. and Noels, L., 2012. Imposing periodic boundary condition on arbitrary meshes by polynomial interpolation. Computational Materials Science. 55: 390-406. |
[37] | Tyrus, J. M., Gosz, M. and DeSantiago, E., 2007. A local finite element implementation for imposing periodic boundary conditions on composite micromechanical models. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 44 (9): 2972-2989. |
[38] | Xia, Z., Zhang, Y. and Ellyin, F., 2003. A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 40 (8): 1907-1921. |
[39] | Okereke, M. and Keates, S., 2018. Finite Element Applications. |
[40] | Vena, P. and Contro, R., 2002. Identification of boundary conditions by iterative analyses of suitably refined subdomains at biomaterials interfaces. |
[41] | Niesłony, P., Grzesik, W., Chudy, R. a. and Habrat, W., 2015. Meshing strategies in FEM simulation of the machining process. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 15 (1): 62-70. |
[42] | Hu, W. and Chen, Z., 2003. A multi-mesh MPM for simulating the meshing process of spur gears. Computers & Structures. 81 (20): 1991-2002. |
[43] | Bordas, S. P., Rabczuk, T., Rodenas, J., Kerfriden, P., Moumnassi, M. and Belouettar, S., 2010. Recent advances towards reducing the meshing and re-meshing burden in computational sciences. |
[44] | Wu, S. R., 2004. Corner meshing effect on component lateral impact simulation. International Journal of Vehicle Design. 32 (1-2). |
[45] | Niesłony, P., Grzesik, W. a. and Chudy, R., 2015. Meshing strategies in FEM simulation of the machining process. Internatonal Journal of Food Contamination. 15: 62-70. |
[46] | Kim, Y. T., Lee, Min Jung and Lee, B. C., 2011. Simulation of adhesive joints using the superimposed finite element method and a cohesive zone mode. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 31 (5): 357-362. |
[47] | Srikanth, M. R., 2015. Study on Analysis of Flexible Pavement using Finite Element based Software Tool. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT). 4 (9). |
[48] | Saevarsdottir, T. and Erlingsson, S., 2014. Modelling of responses and rutting profile of a flexible pavement structure in a heavy vehicle simulator test. Road Materials and Pavement Design. 16 (1): 1-18. |
[49] | Brill, D. R., and Parsons, I. D., 2001. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis in Airport Pavement Design. The International Journal of Geomechanics. 1 273–290. |
[50] | Ekwulo, E. O. and Eme, D. B., 2009. Fatigue and rutting strain analysis of flexible pavements designed using CBR methods. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 3 (12): 412-421. |
[51] | Saad, B., Mitri, H. and Poorooshas, H., 2006. 3D FE Analysis of Flexible Pavement with Geosynthetic Reinforcement. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 132: 402-415. |
[52] | Abed, A. H. and Al-Azzawi, A. A., 2012. Evaluation of Rutting Depth in Flexible Pavements by Using Finite Element Analysis and Local Empirical Model>. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 5 (2): 163-169. |
[53] | Brunetti, G., Šimůnek, J. A. and Piro, P., 2016. A comprehensive numerical analysis of the hydraulic behavior of a permeable pavement. Journal of Hydrology. 540: 1146-1161. |
[54] | Arimilli, S. and Nagabhushana, M. N., Jain, P. K., 2017. Comparative mechanistic-empirical analysis for design of alternative cold recycled asphalt technologies with conventional pavement. Road Materials and Pavement Design. 19 (7): 1595-1616. |
[55] | Li, Q., Xiao, D. X., Wang, K. C., Hall, K. D. and Qiu, Y. J. J. o. M. T., 2011. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG): a bird's-eye view. 19 (2): 114-133. |
[56] | Ghosh, A., Padmarekha, A. and Krishnan, J. M., 2013. Implementation and Proof-checking of Mechanistic-empirical Pavement Design for Indian Highways Using AASHTOWARE Pavement ME Design Software. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 104: 119-128. |
[57] | Omer Jr., 2018. Numerical Analysis of Road Pavement Response. Advancements in Civil Engineering & Technology. 2 (1). |
[58] | Chegenizadeh, A., Keramatikerman, M. and Nikraz, H., 2016. Flexible pavement modelling using Kenlayer. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 21: 2467-2479. |
[59] | Rind, T. A., Jhatial, A. A., Sandhu, A. R., Bhatti, I. A. and Ahmed, S., 2019. Fatigue and rutting analysis of asphaltic pavement using "KENLAYER" software. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences. 9 (2): 177-182. |
[60] | AN, M. K. and Kumar, P., 2020. Analysis of Flexible Pavement using IITPAVE Software and Economic Analysis of the Project using HDM-4 Software. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology 8. |
[61] | Singha, A., Sharmab, A. and Choprac, T., 2019. Analysis of the Flexible Pavement Using Falling Weight Deflectometer for Indian National Highway Road Network. Transportation Research Procedia. 48: 3969–3979. |
[62] | Li, S., Tang, L. and Yao, K., 2020. Comparison of Two Typical Professional Programs for Mechanical Analysis of Interlayer Bonding of Asphalt Pavement Structure. Hindawi Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. |
[63] | Ebrahim, A. and El-Maaty, B. A., 2012. Fatigue and rutting lives in flexible pavement. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 3 (4): 367-374. |
[64] | Jiu-peng, Z., Shu-hua, W., Jian-zhong, P. and Yan-wei, L., 2014. Analysis of Mechanical Responses of Asphalt Pavement Interlayers Based on Shear Spring Compliance Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development. 8 (1). |
[65] | Yan, G., Ye, Z., Wang, W. and Wang, L., 2020. Numerical analysis on distribution and response of acceleration field of pavement under moving load. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. 14: 519-529. |
[66] | Mahboub, K. C., Liu, M. A. Y. and L., A. D., 2004. Evaluation of Temperature Reponses in Concrete Pavement. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 130: 395. |
[67] | Yanov, D. V. and Zelepugin, S. A., 2019. Road pavement design using the finite element method. IOP Conf. Series, Orlando, Florida, Journal of Physics. |
[68] | Su, L., 2014. Mechanics analysis of flexible base Pavement Structure. Applied Mechanics and Materials.,: 632-635. |
[69] | Haponiuk, B. and Zbiciak, A., 2016. Mechanistic-Empirical Asphalt Pavement Design Considering the Effect of Seasonal Temperature Variations De Gruyter. LXII: 4. |
[70] | Tanga, F., Maa, T., Guan, Y. and Zhang, Z., 2020. Parametric modeling and structure verification of asphalt pavement based on BIM-ABAQUS. Automation in Construction. 111. |
[71] | Sarkar, A. (2015). Numerical comparison of flexible pavement dynamic response under different axles. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 17 (5): 377-387. |
[72] | Kim, M. and Tutumluer, E. (2006) of Conference. Finite element method, Geomaterials, Nonlinear analysis, Pavements, Three-dimensional analysis, Stress analysis, Foundations, Asphalt pavements. GeoShanghai International Conference Shanghai, China. |
[73] | Liu, P., Xing, Q., Wang, D. and Oeser, M. (2017). Application of Dynamic Analysis in Semi-Analytical Finite Element Method. Material (MDPI). 10 (9): 1010. |
APA Style
Elvis Siaway Kwado Mensahn, Surajo Abubakar Wada, Lameck Lugeiyamu. (2022). Roadway Pavement Design Methods, Structural Approaches and Relevant Computer Algorithms: A Critical Review. International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology, 8(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12
ACS Style
Elvis Siaway Kwado Mensahn; Surajo Abubakar Wada; Lameck Lugeiyamu. Roadway Pavement Design Methods, Structural Approaches and Relevant Computer Algorithms: A Critical Review. Int. J. Transp. Eng. Technol. 2022, 8(1), 13-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12
AMA Style
Elvis Siaway Kwado Mensahn, Surajo Abubakar Wada, Lameck Lugeiyamu. Roadway Pavement Design Methods, Structural Approaches and Relevant Computer Algorithms: A Critical Review. Int J Transp Eng Technol. 2022;8(1):13-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12, author = {Elvis Siaway Kwado Mensahn and Surajo Abubakar Wada and Lameck Lugeiyamu}, title = {Roadway Pavement Design Methods, Structural Approaches and Relevant Computer Algorithms: A Critical Review}, journal = {International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology}, volume = {8}, number = {1}, pages = {13-23}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijtet.20220801.12}, abstract = {Transport and international agencies invest millions of dollars on road projects to support countries develop their infrastructure; therefore, it is important to ensure longer service life and value for money. The primary function of the pavement structure is to keep distresses, including fatigue cracking and permanent deformation, to an acceptable limit so that the pavement can withstand applied vehicle load and repetitions during the service duration. Furthermore, the layered structure of the pavement is intended to ensure that the vehicle contact pressure is distributed in such a way that critical responses at the bottom layer of the pavement are low enough to avoid severe damage. Two typical procedures associated with roadway pavement design are empirical-based and structural analysis methods. However, the empirical-based methods have significant shortcomings, as predicting the mode and extent of pavement performance becomes a major challenge. Alternatively, the structural analysis methods have advanced extensively with computers since they consider crucial factors such as traffic loads, material characteristics and environmental conditions. The imputation of these parameters into the computer algorithm contributes to a better understanding of the mechanical performance of constituent pavement material responses. The predicted responses enable highway engineers to select appropriate pavement compositions that will deteriorate at a satisfactory level during the time of service. The most common structural analysis approaches are analytical modelling and numerical simulation. On the other hand, differences in analysis results generation using these approaches have been a notable concern. This review article presents a synopsis of typical pavement design methods and the problem connected with them; structural approaches to identify factors influencing their accuracy. Furthermore, computer algorithms use due to their usefulness, and the assumptions of layered theories employed in pavement structural design are discussed to uncover potential drawbacks for future upgrades.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Roadway Pavement Design Methods, Structural Approaches and Relevant Computer Algorithms: A Critical Review AU - Elvis Siaway Kwado Mensahn AU - Surajo Abubakar Wada AU - Lameck Lugeiyamu Y1 - 2022/02/28 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12 T2 - International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology JF - International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology JO - International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology SP - 13 EP - 23 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1751 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijtet.20220801.12 AB - Transport and international agencies invest millions of dollars on road projects to support countries develop their infrastructure; therefore, it is important to ensure longer service life and value for money. The primary function of the pavement structure is to keep distresses, including fatigue cracking and permanent deformation, to an acceptable limit so that the pavement can withstand applied vehicle load and repetitions during the service duration. Furthermore, the layered structure of the pavement is intended to ensure that the vehicle contact pressure is distributed in such a way that critical responses at the bottom layer of the pavement are low enough to avoid severe damage. Two typical procedures associated with roadway pavement design are empirical-based and structural analysis methods. However, the empirical-based methods have significant shortcomings, as predicting the mode and extent of pavement performance becomes a major challenge. Alternatively, the structural analysis methods have advanced extensively with computers since they consider crucial factors such as traffic loads, material characteristics and environmental conditions. The imputation of these parameters into the computer algorithm contributes to a better understanding of the mechanical performance of constituent pavement material responses. The predicted responses enable highway engineers to select appropriate pavement compositions that will deteriorate at a satisfactory level during the time of service. The most common structural analysis approaches are analytical modelling and numerical simulation. On the other hand, differences in analysis results generation using these approaches have been a notable concern. This review article presents a synopsis of typical pavement design methods and the problem connected with them; structural approaches to identify factors influencing their accuracy. Furthermore, computer algorithms use due to their usefulness, and the assumptions of layered theories employed in pavement structural design are discussed to uncover potential drawbacks for future upgrades. VL - 8 IS - 1 ER -