The paper is based on Herbert Marcuse’s analysis of language in the One-Dimensional Man, it elaborates on the current problems in the field of discourse. With the continuous technological innovation, the improvement of productivity and efficiency separates discourse from the broadest public, and some people grab the ownership and use right of certain discourse. Moreover, the irregular use of language not only damages the language itself, but also destroys the discourse ecology, thus causing the defect of the public discourse right. Analyzing the impact of these phenomena on the society and the public is conducive to solving the injustice in the current society. The use of discourse should belong to all people, because everyone lives in the world equally. The author used literature analysis method to study the separation of discourse and the public in the current society from the interdisciplinary perspective, in order to call for renewed public attention to discourse. The concern of discourse ownership is the pursuit of fairness and justice. In the process of the public's equal enjoyment of all rights arising from language, it will not only promote the confirmation and play of human subjectivity, but also benefit the development of the whole society.
Published in | Communication and Linguistics Studies (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14 |
Page(s) | 64-68 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Discourse, The Public, The Subject
[1] | Herbert Marcuse (1964). One-Dimensional Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. |
[2] | Martin Cohen (2001). Political Philosophy From Plato to Mao. London: Pluto Press. |
[3] | R. M. Hare (1952). The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press. |
[4] | Hannah Arendt (1973). The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company. |
[5] | Gustave Le Bon (1896). The Crowd. New York: Dover Publications, Inc. |
[6] | Walter Lippmann (1993). The Phantom Public. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. |
[7] | Lorna Finlayson (2015). The Political is Political. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International, Ltd. |
[8] | David O. Brink (1989). Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[9] | Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri (2004). Multitude War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: The Penguin Press. |
[10] | David Sobel, Peter Vallentyne, and Steven Wall (2021). Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy. London: Oxford University Press. |
[11] | John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig, and Anne Phillips (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. London: Oxford University Press. |
[12] | Sebastian Gardner (2009). Sartre’s Being and Nothingness: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum. |
[13] | D. Q. Mclnerny (2004). Being Logical. New York: Random House. |
[14] | Nicholas Bunnin and Jiyuan Yu (2004). The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. |
[15] | Rainer Forst (1994). Contexts of Justice: Political Philosophy beyond Liberalism and Communitarianism. Berkeley: University of California Press. |
APA Style
Zhang Meng. (2021). The Subject of Discourse Is the Public: Interpretation Based on One-Dimensional Man. Communication and Linguistics Studies, 7(3), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14
ACS Style
Zhang Meng. The Subject of Discourse Is the Public: Interpretation Based on One-Dimensional Man. Commun. Linguist. Stud. 2021, 7(3), 64-68. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14
AMA Style
Zhang Meng. The Subject of Discourse Is the Public: Interpretation Based on One-Dimensional Man. Commun Linguist Stud. 2021;7(3):64-68. doi: 10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14
@article{10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14, author = {Zhang Meng}, title = {The Subject of Discourse Is the Public: Interpretation Based on One-Dimensional Man}, journal = {Communication and Linguistics Studies}, volume = {7}, number = {3}, pages = {64-68}, doi = {10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cls.20210703.14}, abstract = {The paper is based on Herbert Marcuse’s analysis of language in the One-Dimensional Man, it elaborates on the current problems in the field of discourse. With the continuous technological innovation, the improvement of productivity and efficiency separates discourse from the broadest public, and some people grab the ownership and use right of certain discourse. Moreover, the irregular use of language not only damages the language itself, but also destroys the discourse ecology, thus causing the defect of the public discourse right. Analyzing the impact of these phenomena on the society and the public is conducive to solving the injustice in the current society. The use of discourse should belong to all people, because everyone lives in the world equally. The author used literature analysis method to study the separation of discourse and the public in the current society from the interdisciplinary perspective, in order to call for renewed public attention to discourse. The concern of discourse ownership is the pursuit of fairness and justice. In the process of the public's equal enjoyment of all rights arising from language, it will not only promote the confirmation and play of human subjectivity, but also benefit the development of the whole society.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Subject of Discourse Is the Public: Interpretation Based on One-Dimensional Man AU - Zhang Meng Y1 - 2021/11/05 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14 DO - 10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14 T2 - Communication and Linguistics Studies JF - Communication and Linguistics Studies JO - Communication and Linguistics Studies SP - 64 EP - 68 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2380-2529 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cls.20210703.14 AB - The paper is based on Herbert Marcuse’s analysis of language in the One-Dimensional Man, it elaborates on the current problems in the field of discourse. With the continuous technological innovation, the improvement of productivity and efficiency separates discourse from the broadest public, and some people grab the ownership and use right of certain discourse. Moreover, the irregular use of language not only damages the language itself, but also destroys the discourse ecology, thus causing the defect of the public discourse right. Analyzing the impact of these phenomena on the society and the public is conducive to solving the injustice in the current society. The use of discourse should belong to all people, because everyone lives in the world equally. The author used literature analysis method to study the separation of discourse and the public in the current society from the interdisciplinary perspective, in order to call for renewed public attention to discourse. The concern of discourse ownership is the pursuit of fairness and justice. In the process of the public's equal enjoyment of all rights arising from language, it will not only promote the confirmation and play of human subjectivity, but also benefit the development of the whole society. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -